Iceland vs Nepal: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre

Iceland
40.08 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
44.16 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
53rd
Nepal rank
52nd

Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Nepal
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 44.16 million current LCU per square kilometre against 40.08 million current LCU per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 4.08 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 53rd and Nepal ranks 52nd of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 6 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 865.82 current LCU per square kilometre 448.87 current LCU per square kilometre 416.94 current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 9,128 current LCU per square kilometre 8,867 current LCU per square kilometre 261.07 current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 573,566 current LCU per square kilometre 86,112 current LCU per square kilometre 487,454 current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 2.79 million current LCU per square kilometre 499,500 current LCU per square kilometre 2.29 million current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 24.15 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.12 million current LCU per square kilometre 22.03 million current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 27.69 million current LCU per square kilometre 12.40 million current LCU per square kilometre 15.29 million current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 35.44 million current LCU per square kilometre 37.67 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.23 million current LCU per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre, Iceland or Nepal?
Nepal, at 44.16 million current LCU per square kilometre against 40.08 million current LCU per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre between Iceland and Nepal?
4.08 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Nepal rank globally for net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 53rd and Nepal ranks 52nd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Nepal: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iceland/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iceland/nepal/">Iceland vs Nepal: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net domestic credit (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.