Jamaica vs Rwanda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre

Jamaica
175.30 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
171.81 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
24th
Rwanda rank
25th

Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Jamaica
  • Rwanda
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 175.30 million current LCU per square kilometre against 171.81 million current LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 3.49 million current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Rwanda ahead.

Jamaica ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 25th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 16,672 current LCU per square kilometre 47,278 current LCU per square kilometre 30,606 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 104,897 current LCU per square kilometre 154,208 current LCU per square kilometre 49,311 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 729,289 current LCU per square kilometre 632,554 current LCU per square kilometre 96,735 current LCU per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 6.64 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.16 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.48 million current LCU per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 35.91 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 30.41 million current LCU per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 80.20 million current LCU per square kilometre 40.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 39.98 million current LCU per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 158.96 million current LCU per square kilometre 132.87 million current LCU per square kilometre 26.08 million current LCU per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre, Jamaica or Rwanda?
Jamaica, at 175.30 million current LCU per square kilometre against 171.81 million current LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre between Jamaica and Rwanda?
3.49 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Rwanda?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Rwanda rank globally for net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Jamaica ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 25th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Rwanda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/rwanda/">Jamaica vs Rwanda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net domestic credit (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.