Madagascar vs Sweden: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre

Madagascar
26.59 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
25.69 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar rank
59th
Sweden rank
60th

Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Madagascar
  • Sweden
010.0M20.0M30.0M196119922023

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 26.59 million current LCU per square kilometre against 25.69 million current LCU per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 899,200 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Sweden ahead.

Madagascar ranks 59th and Sweden ranks 60th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 7,711 current LCU per square kilometre 154,207 current LCU per square kilometre 146,496 current LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 31,003 current LCU per square kilometre 385,164 current LCU per square kilometre 354,160 current LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 228,509 current LCU per square kilometre 1.35 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.12 million current LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 746,775 current LCU per square kilometre 2.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.47 million current LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 2.31 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.31 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.01 million current LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 9.61 million current LCU per square kilometre 15.80 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.19 million current LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 24.13 million current LCU per square kilometre 23.76 million current LCU per square kilometre 372,875 current LCU per square kilometre Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre, Madagascar or Sweden?
Madagascar, at 26.59 million current LCU per square kilometre against 25.69 million current LCU per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre between Madagascar and Sweden?
899,200 current LCU per square kilometre, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Sweden?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Madagascar and Sweden rank globally for net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Madagascar ranks 59th and Sweden ranks 60th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Sweden: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/sweden/">Madagascar vs Sweden: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net domestic credit (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.