Qatar vs Rwanda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre

Qatar
121.20 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
171.81 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar rank
28th
Rwanda rank
25th

Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Qatar
  • Rwanda
050.0M100.0M150.0M196419932023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 171.81 million current LCU per square kilometre against 121.20 million current LCU per square kilometre in Qatar, a difference of 50.62 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.4 times Qatar's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Rwanda ahead.

Qatar ranks 28th and Rwanda ranks 25th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Qatar Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 8,413 current LCU per square kilometre 59,577 current LCU per square kilometre 51,164 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 97,146 current LCU per square kilometre 154,208 current LCU per square kilometre 57,062 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 529,436 current LCU per square kilometre 632,554 current LCU per square kilometre 103,117 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 1.58 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.16 million current LCU per square kilometre 578,273 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 8.53 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.03 million current LCU per square kilometre Qatar
2010s 59.99 million current LCU per square kilometre 40.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 19.77 million current LCU per square kilometre Qatar
2020s 113.02 million current LCU per square kilometre 132.87 million current LCU per square kilometre 19.86 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre, Qatar or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 171.81 million current LCU per square kilometre against 121.20 million current LCU per square kilometre in Qatar as of 2023.
What is the difference in net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre between Qatar and Rwanda?
50.62 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Rwanda?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Qatar and Rwanda rank globally for net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Qatar ranks 28th and Rwanda ranks 25th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Qatar vs Rwanda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/qatar/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/qatar/rwanda/">Qatar vs Rwanda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net domestic credit (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.