Solomon Islands vs Zimbabwe: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre

Solomon Islands
80,151 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
14,460 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands rank
177th
Zimbabwe rank
180th

Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • Zimbabwe
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k197820002023

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 80,151 current LCU per square kilometre against 14,460 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 65,691 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 5.5 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.

Solomon Islands ranks 177th and Zimbabwe ranks 180th of 185 countries.

Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Solomon Islands Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 315.45 current LCU per square kilometre 0.095 current LCU per square kilometre 315.36 current LCU per square kilometre Solomon Islands
1980s 2,007 current LCU per square kilometre 3.02 current LCU per square kilometre 2,004 current LCU per square kilometre Solomon Islands
1990s 10,941 current LCU per square kilometre 2.45 current LCU per square kilometre 10,939 current LCU per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2000s 19,945 current LCU per square kilometre 3.99 current LCU per square kilometre 19,941 current LCU per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2010s 28,236 current LCU per square kilometre 9.18 current LCU per square kilometre 28,227 current LCU per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2020s 67,637 current LCU per square kilometre 4,116 current LCU per square kilometre 63,521 current LCU per square kilometre Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre, Solomon Islands or Zimbabwe?
Solomon Islands, at 80,151 current LCU per square kilometre against 14,460 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre between Solomon Islands and Zimbabwe?
65,691 current LCU per square kilometre, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Zimbabwe?
42 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2023.
How do Solomon Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Solomon Islands ranks 177th and Zimbabwe ranks 180th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Solomon Islands vs Zimbabwe: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/solomon-islands/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/solomon-islands/zimbabwe/">Solomon Islands vs Zimbabwe: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net domestic credit (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.