Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Uganda: Net domestic credit to private sector, stock

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
143.20 billion current LCU
in 2006
Uganda
4.75 trillion current LCU
in 2011
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
3rd
Uganda rank
4th

Net domestic credit to private sector, stock over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
  • Uganda
01.0T2.0T3.0T4.0T5.0T196519882011

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 4.75 trillion current LCU against 143.20 billion current LCU in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 4.61 trillion current LCU.

That makes Uganda's figure about 33.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 3rd and Uganda ranks 4th of 5 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Uganda Difference Ahead
1980s 10.98 billion current LCU 10.30 billion current LCU 688.41 million current LCU Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
1990s 33.57 billion current LCU 257.13 billion current LCU 223.56 billion current LCU Uganda
2000s 93.20 billion current LCU 909.94 billion current LCU 816.74 billion current LCU Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net domestic credit to private sector, stock, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) or Uganda?
Uganda, at 4.75 trillion current LCU against 143.20 billion current LCU in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2011.
What is the difference in net domestic credit to private sector, stock between Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Uganda?
4.61 trillion current LCU, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Uganda?
23 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2006.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Uganda rank globally for net domestic credit to private sector, stock?
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 3rd and Uganda ranks 4th of 5 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics and data files, published as Net domestic credit to private sector, stock (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Uganda: Net domestic credit to private sector, stock. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics and data files. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-to-private-sector-stock-current-lcu/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-to-private-sector-stock-current-lcu/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/uganda/">Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Uganda: Net domestic credit to private sector, stock</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net domestic credit to private sector, stock (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics and data files
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
55 places, 1,698 data points, 1960–2011
Last refreshed

Claims on other sectors of the domestic economy (IFS line 32S..ZK) include gross credit from the financial system to households, nonprofit institutions serving households, nonfinancial corporations, state and local governments, and social security funds.