Algeria vs Iceland: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre

Algeria
3.74 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
3.37 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Algeria rank
76th
Iceland rank
78th

Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Algeria
  • Iceland
-15.0M-10.0M-5.0M05.0M10.0M196119922023

How they compare

Algeria currently reports 3.74 million current LCU per square kilometre against 3.37 million current LCU per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 370,160 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Algeria's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Algeria ahead.

Algeria ranks 76th and Iceland ranks 78th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 5 and Iceland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 699.77 current LCU per square kilometre 255 current LCU per square kilometre 444.77 current LCU per square kilometre Algeria
1970s 1,058 current LCU per square kilometre -745.12 current LCU per square kilometre 1,803 current LCU per square kilometre Algeria
1980s -5,944 current LCU per square kilometre -83,642 current LCU per square kilometre 77,698 current LCU per square kilometre Algeria
1990s 5,866 current LCU per square kilometre -268,163 current LCU per square kilometre 274,028 current LCU per square kilometre Algeria
2000s 1.98 million current LCU per square kilometre -290,702 current LCU per square kilometre 2.27 million current LCU per square kilometre Algeria
2010s 5.32 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.08 million current LCU per square kilometre 766,931 current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 3.08 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.79 million current LCU per square kilometre 705,572 current LCU per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre, Algeria or Iceland?
Algeria, at 3.74 million current LCU per square kilometre against 3.37 million current LCU per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre between Algeria and Iceland?
370,160 current LCU per square kilometre, with Algeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Iceland?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Algeria and Iceland rank globally for net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Algeria ranks 76th and Iceland ranks 78th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Algeria vs Iceland: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/algeria/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/algeria/iceland/">Algeria vs Iceland: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,583 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net foreign assets (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.