Botswana vs East Timor: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre

Botswana
125,218 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
139,151 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
143rd
East Timor rank
140th

Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • East Timor
050.0k100.0k150.0k197619992023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 139,151 current LCU per square kilometre against 125,218 current LCU per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 13,933 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 143rd and East Timor ranks 140th of 185 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 79,056 current LCU per square kilometre 15,028 current LCU per square kilometre 64,028 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 131,116 current LCU per square kilometre 71,518 current LCU per square kilometre 59,598 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 116,831 current LCU per square kilometre 131,370 current LCU per square kilometre 14,540 current LCU per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre, Botswana or East Timor?
East Timor, at 139,151 current LCU per square kilometre against 125,218 current LCU per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre between Botswana and East Timor?
13,933 current LCU per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and East Timor?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Botswana and East Timor rank globally for net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 143rd and East Timor ranks 140th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs East Timor: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/timor-leste/">Botswana vs East Timor: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,583 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net foreign assets (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.