Burundi vs Pakistan: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre

Burundi
-53.71 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
-3.21 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
185th
Pakistan rank
182nd

Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Burundi
  • Pakistan
-60.0M-40.0M-20.0M020.0M196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports -3.21 million current LCU per square kilometre against -53.71 million current LCU per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 50.49 million current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 185th and Pakistan ranks 182nd of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 6 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 13,729 current LCU per square kilometre 1,762 current LCU per square kilometre 11,967 current LCU per square kilometre Burundi
1970s 109,096 current LCU per square kilometre 1,321 current LCU per square kilometre 107,775 current LCU per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 78,227 current LCU per square kilometre -12,787 current LCU per square kilometre 91,013 current LCU per square kilometre Burundi
1990s 1.11 million current LCU per square kilometre -62,387 current LCU per square kilometre 1.17 million current LCU per square kilometre Burundi
2000s 3.63 million current LCU per square kilometre 678,773 current LCU per square kilometre 2.95 million current LCU per square kilometre Burundi
2010s 1.08 million current LCU per square kilometre 832,443 current LCU per square kilometre 247,712 current LCU per square kilometre Burundi
2020s -26.70 million current LCU per square kilometre -1.33 million current LCU per square kilometre 25.37 million current LCU per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre, Burundi or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at -3.21 million current LCU per square kilometre against -53.71 million current LCU per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre between Burundi and Pakistan?
50.49 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Pakistan?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Pakistan rank globally for net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Burundi ranks 185th and Pakistan ranks 182nd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Pakistan: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burundi/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burundi/pakistan/">Burundi vs Pakistan: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,583 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net foreign assets (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.