Cabo Verde vs Philippines: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre

Cabo Verde
19.00 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
21.99 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cabo Verde rank
39th
Philippines rank
36th

Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • Philippines
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196119922023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 21.99 million current LCU per square kilometre against 19.00 million current LCU per square kilometre in Cabo Verde, a difference of 2.99 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.2 times Cabo Verde's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Cabo Verde ahead.

Cabo Verde ranks 39th and Philippines ranks 36th of 185 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 4 and Philippines in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde Philippines Difference Ahead
1970s 330,363 current LCU per square kilometre -17,190 current LCU per square kilometre 347,553 current LCU per square kilometre Cabo Verde
1980s 928,917 current LCU per square kilometre -281,711 current LCU per square kilometre 1.21 million current LCU per square kilometre Cabo Verde
1990s 1.45 million current LCU per square kilometre 205,950 current LCU per square kilometre 1.25 million current LCU per square kilometre Cabo Verde
2000s 4.62 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.96 million current LCU per square kilometre 660,304 current LCU per square kilometre Cabo Verde
2010s 11.01 million current LCU per square kilometre 12.98 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.97 million current LCU per square kilometre Philippines
2020s 16.62 million current LCU per square kilometre 21.31 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.69 million current LCU per square kilometre Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre, Cabo Verde or Philippines?
Philippines, at 21.99 million current LCU per square kilometre against 19.00 million current LCU per square kilometre in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre between Cabo Verde and Philippines?
2.99 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Philippines?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Cabo Verde and Philippines rank globally for net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Cabo Verde ranks 39th and Philippines ranks 36th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs Philippines: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/philippines/">Cabo Verde vs Philippines: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,583 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net foreign assets (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.