El Salvador vs Zambia: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre

El Salvador
70,196 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
75,946 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
152nd
Zambia rank
151st

Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Zambia
-50.0k050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 75,946 current LCU per square kilometre against 70,196 current LCU per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 5,750 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1965 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 152nd and Zambia ranks 151st of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 1,049 current LCU per square kilometre 0.2284 current LCU per square kilometre 1,049 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 1,941 current LCU per square kilometre -0.0784 current LCU per square kilometre 1,941 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s -15,094 current LCU per square kilometre -9.24 current LCU per square kilometre 15,084 current LCU per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 34,662 current LCU per square kilometre 26.06 current LCU per square kilometre 34,636 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 78,031 current LCU per square kilometre 990.68 current LCU per square kilometre 77,040 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 109,289 current LCU per square kilometre 23,886 current LCU per square kilometre 85,403 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 89,068 current LCU per square kilometre 61,752 current LCU per square kilometre 27,316 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Zambia?
Zambia, at 75,946 current LCU per square kilometre against 70,196 current LCU per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Zambia?
5,750 current LCU per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zambia?
58 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Zambia rank globally for net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 152nd and Zambia ranks 151st of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Zambia: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/zambia/">El Salvador vs Zambia: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,583 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net foreign assets (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.