Haiti vs Tanzania: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre

Haiti
10.54 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
9.84 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Haiti rank
55th
Tanzania rank
57th

Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Haiti
  • Tanzania
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 10.54 million current LCU per square kilometre against 9.84 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 693,300 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Haiti's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Tanzania ahead.

Haiti ranks 55th and Tanzania ranks 57th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Haiti Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s -1,261 current LCU per square kilometre 764.62 current LCU per square kilometre 2,026 current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania
1970s -4,520 current LCU per square kilometre 788.82 current LCU per square kilometre 5,309 current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s -30,810 current LCU per square kilometre -41,356 current LCU per square kilometre 10,546 current LCU per square kilometre Haiti
1990s 89,053 current LCU per square kilometre -70,757 current LCU per square kilometre 159,809 current LCU per square kilometre Haiti
2000s 605,519 current LCU per square kilometre 3.07 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.46 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 4.20 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.32 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.12 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania
2020s 8.25 million current LCU per square kilometre 11.28 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.04 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre, Haiti or Tanzania?
Haiti, at 10.54 million current LCU per square kilometre against 9.84 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre between Haiti and Tanzania?
693,300 current LCU per square kilometre, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Tanzania?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Haiti and Tanzania rank globally for net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Haiti ranks 55th and Tanzania ranks 57th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Haiti vs Tanzania: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/haiti/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/haiti/tanzania/">Haiti vs Tanzania: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,583 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net foreign assets (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.