Hong Kong, China vs Republic of Korea: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre

Hong Kong, China
8.92 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Republic of Korea
5.43 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
2nd
Republic of Korea rank
3rd

Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Republic of Korea
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 8.92 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 5.43 billion current LCU per square kilometre in Republic of Korea, a difference of 3.49 billion current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.6 times Republic of Korea's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 2nd and Republic of Korea ranks 3rd of 185 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
1990s 720.01 million current LCU per square kilometre 293.54 million current LCU per square kilometre 426.47 million current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 2.56 billion current LCU per square kilometre 1.73 billion current LCU per square kilometre 828.27 million current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 5.44 billion current LCU per square kilometre 3.34 billion current LCU per square kilometre 2.11 billion current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 8.38 billion current LCU per square kilometre 4.95 billion current LCU per square kilometre 3.43 billion current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre, Hong Kong, China or Republic of Korea?
Hong Kong, China, at 8.92 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 5.43 billion current LCU per square kilometre in Republic of Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre between Hong Kong, China and Republic of Korea?
3.49 billion current LCU per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Republic of Korea?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Republic of Korea rank globally for net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong, China ranks 2nd and Republic of Korea ranks 3rd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Republic of Korea: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/korea-rep/">Hong Kong, China vs Republic of Korea: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,583 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net foreign assets (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.