Jamaica vs Rwanda: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre

Jamaica
64.31 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
81.54 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
20th
Rwanda rank
18th

Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Jamaica
  • Rwanda
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 81.54 million current LCU per square kilometre against 64.31 million current LCU per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 17.23 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.3 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Rwanda ahead.

Jamaica ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 4,630 current LCU per square kilometre -2,737 current LCU per square kilometre 7,367 current LCU per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s -17,679 current LCU per square kilometre 137,498 current LCU per square kilometre 155,177 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s -401,035 current LCU per square kilometre 338,721 current LCU per square kilometre 739,756 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 1.06 million current LCU per square kilometre 788,283 current LCU per square kilometre 270,475 current LCU per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 8.76 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.64 million current LCU per square kilometre 122,287 current LCU per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 20.84 million current LCU per square kilometre 29.47 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.63 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 48.35 million current LCU per square kilometre 63.83 million current LCU per square kilometre 15.48 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre, Jamaica or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 81.54 million current LCU per square kilometre against 64.31 million current LCU per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre between Jamaica and Rwanda?
17.23 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Rwanda?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Rwanda rank globally for net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Jamaica ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Rwanda: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/rwanda/">Jamaica vs Rwanda: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,583 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net foreign assets (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.