Kazakhstan vs Lebanon: Net foreign assets
Net foreign assets over time
- Kazakhstan
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 51.57 trillion current LCU against 33.54 trillion current LCU in Kazakhstan, a difference of 18.03 trillion current LCU.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.5 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 16th and Lebanon ranks 13th of 186 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 96.09 billion current LCU | 15.21 trillion current LCU | 15.11 trillion current LCU | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 561.46 billion current LCU | 24.33 trillion current LCU | 23.76 trillion current LCU | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 7.69 trillion current LCU | 53.58 trillion current LCU | 45.89 trillion current LCU | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net foreign assets, Kazakhstan or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 51.57 trillion current LCU against 33.54 trillion current LCU in Kazakhstan as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net foreign assets between Kazakhstan and Lebanon?
- 18.03 trillion current LCU, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Lebanon?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
- How do Kazakhstan and Lebanon rank globally for net foreign assets?
- Kazakhstan ranks 16th and Lebanon ranks 13th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Net foreign assets (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net foreign assets are the sum of foreign assets held by monetary authorities and deposit money banks, less their foreign liabilities. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.