Eswatini vs Kazakhstan: Number of listed companies per 1,000,000 people
Eswatini
5.75
in 2007
Kazakhstan
5.01
in 2020
Eswatini rank
62nd
Kazakhstan rank
65th
Number of listed companies per 1,000,000 people over time
- Eswatini
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 5.75 against 5.01 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.74.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 62nd and Kazakhstan ranks 65th of 97 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.14 | 0.9558 | 4.18 | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 5.5 | 4.28 | 1.23 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of listed companies per 1,000,000 people, Eswatini or Kazakhstan?
- Eswatini, at 5.75 against 5.01 in Kazakhstan as of 2007.
- What is the difference in number of listed companies per 1,000,000 people between Eswatini and Kazakhstan?
- 0.74, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Kazakhstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2007.
- How do Eswatini and Kazakhstan rank globally for number of listed companies per 1,000,000 people?
- Eswatini ranks 62nd and Kazakhstan ranks 65th of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Stock Markets Factbook and supplemental S&P data, Standard & Poor's, published as Number of listed companies per 1,000,000 people. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of publicly listed companies per 1,000,000 people. Number of listed domestic companies is the domestically incorporated companies listed on the country's stock exchanges at the end of the year. This indicator does not include investment companies, mutual funds, or other collective investment vehicles.