Armenia vs Chile: Numerical Targets (PO)
Numerical Targets (PO) over time
- Armenia
- Chile
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 124.89 against 111.75 in Chile, a difference of 13.14.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Chile ahead.
Armenia ranks 13th and Chile ranks 16th of 47 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 116.59 | 111.75 | 4.84 | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher numerical targets (po), Armenia or Chile?
- Armenia, at 124.89 against 111.75 in Chile as of 2018.
- What is the difference in numerical targets (po) between Armenia and Chile?
- 13.14, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Chile?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Armenia and Chile rank globally for numerical targets (po)?
- Armenia ranks 13th and Chile ranks 16th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Numerical Targets (PO) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).