Armenia vs Pakistan: Numerical Targets (PO)
Numerical Targets (PO) over time
- Armenia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 139.56 against 124.89 in Armenia, a difference of 14.67.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Pakistan ahead.
Armenia ranks 13th and Pakistan ranks 12th of 47 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 116.59 | 109.93 | 6.66 | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher numerical targets (po), Armenia or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 139.56 against 124.89 in Armenia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in numerical targets (po) between Armenia and Pakistan?
- 14.67, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Pakistan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Armenia and Pakistan rank globally for numerical targets (po)?
- Armenia ranks 13th and Pakistan ranks 12th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Numerical Targets (PO) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).