Australia vs Brazil: Numerical Targets (PO)
Australia
100
in 2018
Brazil
100
in 2018
Australia rank
22nd
Brazil rank
22nd
Numerical Targets (PO) over time
- Australia
- Brazil
How they compare
Australia currently reports 100 against 100 in Brazil, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 22nd and Brazil ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher numerical targets (po), Australia or Brazil?
- Australia, at 100 against 100 in Brazil as of 2018.
- What is the difference in numerical targets (po) between Australia and Brazil?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Brazil?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Australia and Brazil rank globally for numerical targets (po)?
- Australia ranks 22nd and Brazil ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Numerical Targets (PO) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).