China vs Philippines: Numerical Targets (PO)
Numerical Targets (PO) over time
- China
- Philippines
How they compare
China currently reports 100 against 100 in Philippines, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Philippines ahead.
China ranks 22nd and Philippines ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 100 | 90.65 | 9.35 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher numerical targets (po), China or Philippines?
- China, at 100 against 100 in Philippines as of 2018.
- What is the difference in numerical targets (po) between China and Philippines?
- 0, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Philippines?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do China and Philippines rank globally for numerical targets (po)?
- China ranks 22nd and Philippines ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Numerical Targets (PO) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).