Hungary vs New Zealand: Numerical Targets (PO)
Numerical Targets (PO) over time
- Hungary
- New Zealand
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 100 against 100 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was New Zealand ahead.
Hungary ranks 22nd and New Zealand ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 100 | 96.49 | 3.51 | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher numerical targets (po), Hungary or New Zealand?
- Hungary, at 100 against 100 in New Zealand as of 2018.
- What is the difference in numerical targets (po) between Hungary and New Zealand?
- 0, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and New Zealand?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Hungary and New Zealand rank globally for numerical targets (po)?
- Hungary ranks 22nd and New Zealand ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Numerical Targets (PO) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).