New Zealand vs Philippines: Numerical Targets (PO)
Numerical Targets (PO) over time
- New Zealand
- Philippines
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 100 against 100 in Philippines, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Philippines ahead.
New Zealand ranks 22nd and Philippines ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 96.49 | 90.65 | 5.84 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher numerical targets (po), New Zealand or Philippines?
- New Zealand, at 100 against 100 in Philippines as of 2018.
- What is the difference in numerical targets (po) between New Zealand and Philippines?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Philippines?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do New Zealand and Philippines rank globally for numerical targets (po)?
- New Zealand ranks 22nd and Philippines ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Numerical Targets (PO) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).