Philippines vs Zambia: Numerical Targets (PO)
Numerical Targets (PO) over time
- Philippines
- Zambia
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 100 against 100 in Zambia, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 22nd and Zambia ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 90.65 | 100 | 9.35 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher numerical targets (po), Philippines or Zambia?
- Philippines, at 100 against 100 in Zambia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in numerical targets (po) between Philippines and Zambia?
- 0, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Zambia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Philippines and Zambia rank globally for numerical targets (po)?
- Philippines ranks 22nd and Zambia ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Numerical Targets (PO) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).