Australia vs Norway: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Australia
2.62 billion
in 2025
Norway
4.30 billion
in 2025
Australia rank
12th
Norway rank
10th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Australia
  • Norway
05.0B10.0B15.0B200020122025

How they compare

Norway currently reports 4.30 billion against 2.62 billion in Australia, a difference of 1.68 billion.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.6 times Australia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 12th and Norway ranks 10th of 81 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Norway Difference Ahead
2000s 240.91 million 10.65 billion 10.40 billion Norway
2010s 519.31 million 3.45 billion 2.93 billion Norway
2020s 1.80 billion 3.85 billion 2.05 billion Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Australia or Norway?
Norway, at 4.30 billion against 2.62 billion in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Australia and Norway?
1.68 billion, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Norway?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Australia and Norway rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Australia ranks 12th and Norway ranks 10th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets other reserve assets, (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social S. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Norway: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-11/australia/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-11/australia/norway/">Australia vs Norway: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets other reserve assets, (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social S
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
83 places, 1,628 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.