Austria vs Georgia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Austria
-28.20 million
in 2025
Georgia
-105,864
in 2025
Austria rank
81st
Georgia rank
78th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Austria
  • Georgia
-1.0B-750.0M-500.0M-250.0M0199920122025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports -105,864 against -28.20 million in Austria, a difference of 28.09 million.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 81st and Georgia ranks 78th of 81 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Georgia Difference Ahead
2010s -120.69 million -108,475 120.58 million Georgia
2020s -4.86 million 2.41 million 7.26 million Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Austria or Georgia?
Georgia, at -105,864 against -28.20 million in Austria as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Austria and Georgia?
28.09 million, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Georgia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
How do Austria and Georgia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Austria ranks 81st and Georgia ranks 78th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets other reserve assets, (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social S. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Georgia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-11/austria/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-11/austria/georgia/">Austria vs Georgia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets other reserve assets, (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social S
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
83 places, 1,628 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.