Guatemala vs North Macedonia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Guatemala
0
in 2025
North Macedonia
0
in 2025
Guatemala rank
51st
North Macedonia rank
51st

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Guatemala
  • North Macedonia
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M200820162025

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0 against 0 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 51st and North Macedonia ranks 51st of 81 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2010s 1,050 0 1,050 Guatemala
2020s 0 254,025 254,025 North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Guatemala or North Macedonia?
Guatemala, at 0 against 0 in North Macedonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Guatemala and North Macedonia?
0, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and North Macedonia?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
How do Guatemala and North Macedonia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Guatemala ranks 51st and North Macedonia ranks 51st of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets other reserve assets, (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social S. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs North Macedonia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-11/guatemala/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-11/guatemala/north-macedonia/">Guatemala vs North Macedonia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets other reserve assets, (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social S
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
83 places, 1,628 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.