Brazil vs Japan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Brazil
12.01 billion
in 2025
Japan
16.30 billion
in 2025
Brazil rank
6th
Japan rank
5th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Brazil
  • Japan
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B200020122025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 16.30 billion against 12.01 billion in Brazil, a difference of 4.29 billion.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.4 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 6th and Japan ranks 5th of 71 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Japan Difference Ahead
2000s 5.40 billion 371.50 million 5.03 billion Brazil
2010s 2.49 billion 503.50 million 1.99 billion Brazil
2020s 14.38 billion 8.55 billion 5.82 billion Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Brazil or Japan?
Japan, at 16.30 billion against 12.01 billion in Brazil as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Brazil and Japan?
4.29 billion, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Japan?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Brazil and Japan rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Brazil ranks 6th and Japan ranks 5th of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, other (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Japan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-13/brazil/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-13/brazil/japan/">Brazil vs Japan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, other (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
73 places, 1,404 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.