Denmark vs Egypt: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Denmark
33.21 billion
in 2025
Egypt
18.19 billion
in 2025
Denmark rank
1st
Egypt rank
3rd

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Denmark
  • Egypt
010.0B20.0B30.0B200920172025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 33.21 billion against 18.19 billion in Egypt, a difference of 15.02 billion.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.8 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 1st and Egypt ranks 3rd of 71 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Egypt in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Egypt Difference Ahead
2010s 10.56 billion 7.91 billion 2.65 billion Denmark
2020s 10.15 billion 14.65 billion 4.50 billion Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Denmark or Egypt?
Denmark, at 33.21 billion against 18.19 billion in Egypt as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Denmark and Egypt?
15.02 billion, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Egypt?
13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Egypt rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Denmark ranks 1st and Egypt ranks 3rd of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, other (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Egypt: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-13/denmark/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-13/denmark/egypt-arab-rep/">Denmark vs Egypt: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, other (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
73 places, 1,404 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.