Denmark vs Israel: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Denmark
413.46 million
in 2025
Israel
64.86 million
in 2025
Denmark rank
3rd
Israel rank
6th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Denmark
  • Israel
-1.0B01.0B200720162025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 413.46 million against 64.86 million in Israel, a difference of 348.60 million.

That makes Denmark's figure about 6.4 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Israel ahead.

Denmark ranks 3rd and Israel ranks 6th of 66 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Israel Difference Ahead
2010s 246,750 -149.84 million 150.08 million Denmark
2020s 161.92 million -107.40 million 269.32 million Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Denmark or Israel?
Denmark, at 413.46 million against 64.86 million in Israel as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Denmark and Israel?
348.60 million, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Israel?
10 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Israel rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Denmark ranks 3rd and Israel ranks 6th of 66 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, financial derivatives (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Israel: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-14/denmark/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-14/denmark/israel/">Denmark vs Israel: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, financial derivatives (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
68 places, 1,196 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.