Denmark vs Slovenia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Denmark
434,521
in 2025
Slovenia
103.19 million
in 2025
Denmark rank
11th
Slovenia rank
10th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Denmark
  • Slovenia
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B200020122025

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 103.19 million against 434,521 in Denmark, a difference of 102.75 million.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 237.5 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 11th and Slovenia ranks 10th of 52 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Slovenia Difference Ahead
2010s 88.99 million 0 88.99 million Denmark
2020s 14.54 million 33.58 million 19.04 million Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Denmark or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 103.19 million against 434,521 in Denmark as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Denmark and Slovenia?
102.75 million, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Slovenia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Slovenia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Denmark ranks 11th and Slovenia ranks 10th of 52 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, loans to non bank nonresidents (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excludin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Slovenia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-17/denmark/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-17/denmark/slovenia/">Denmark vs Slovenia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, loans to non bank nonresidents (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excludin
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
54 places, 916 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.