Czechia vs Mexico: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Czechia
9.22 billion
in 2025
Mexico
7.91 billion
in 2025
Czechia rank
19th
Mexico rank
22nd

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Czechia
  • Mexico
020.0B40.0B60.0B200020122025

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 9.22 billion against 7.91 billion in Mexico, a difference of 1.31 billion.

That makes Czechia's figure about 1.2 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mexico ahead.

Czechia ranks 19th and Mexico ranks 22nd of 89 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Mexico Difference Ahead
2000s 270.23 million 1.43 billion 1.16 billion Mexico
2010s 21.34 billion 8.86 billion 12.48 billion Czechia
2020s 31.37 billion 8.87 billion 22.50 billion Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Czechia or Mexico?
Czechia, at 9.22 billion against 7.91 billion in Mexico as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Czechia and Mexico?
1.31 billion, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Mexico?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Czechia and Mexico rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Czechia ranks 19th and Mexico ranks 22nd of 89 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, with Other National Central Banks, BIS and IMF (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Mexico: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-8/czechia/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-8/czechia/mexico/">Czechia vs Mexico: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, with Other National Central Banks, BIS and IMF (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
91 places, 1,923 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.