Jordan vs Serbia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Jordan
3.04 billion
in 2025
Serbia
3.92 billion
in 2025
Jordan rank
34th
Serbia rank
31st

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Jordan
  • Serbia
02.0B4.0B6.0B200620152025

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 3.92 billion against 3.04 billion in Jordan, a difference of 872.04 million.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 34th and Serbia ranks 31st of 89 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Serbia Difference Ahead
2010s 1.42 billion 359.96 million 1.06 billion Jordan
2020s 1.57 billion 3.00 billion 1.44 billion Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Jordan or Serbia?
Serbia, at 3.92 billion against 3.04 billion in Jordan as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Jordan and Serbia?
872.04 million, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Serbia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
How do Jordan and Serbia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Jordan ranks 34th and Serbia ranks 31st of 89 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, with Other National Central Banks, BIS and IMF (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Serbia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-8/jordan/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-8/jordan/serbia/">Jordan vs Serbia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, with Other National Central Banks, BIS and IMF (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
91 places, 1,923 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.