Malta vs Slovenia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Malta
775,500
in 2025
Slovenia
1.01 million
in 2025
Malta rank
85th
Slovenia rank
84th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Malta
  • Slovenia
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M200020122025

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 1.01 million against 775,500 in Malta, a difference of 236,450.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.3 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 85th and Slovenia ranks 84th of 89 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 1.87 million 858,274 1.01 million Malta
2010s 10.25 million 9.81 million 432,481 Malta
2020s 1.35 million 482,697 867,730 Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Malta or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 1.01 million against 775,500 in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Malta and Slovenia?
236,450, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Slovenia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
How do Malta and Slovenia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Malta ranks 85th and Slovenia ranks 84th of 89 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, with Other National Central Banks, BIS and IMF (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Slovenia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-8/malta/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-8/malta/slovenia/">Malta vs Slovenia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, with Other National Central Banks, BIS and IMF (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
91 places, 1,923 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.