Iceland vs Ukraine: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Iceland
1.47 million
in 2025
Ukraine
0
in 2020
Iceland rank
29th
Ukraine rank
31st

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Iceland
  • Ukraine
0100.0M200.0M300.0M200020122025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 1.47 million against 0 in Ukraine, a difference of 1.47 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Ukraine ahead.

Iceland ranks 29th and Ukraine ranks 31st of 60 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Ukraine Difference Ahead
2000s 2.32 million 150.38 million 148.07 million Ukraine
2010s 2.56 million 221.65 million 219.09 million Ukraine
2020s 2.08 million 0 2.08 million Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Iceland or Ukraine?
Iceland, at 1.47 million against 0 in Ukraine as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Iceland and Ukraine?
1.47 million, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Ukraine?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
How do Iceland and Ukraine rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Iceland ranks 29th and Ukraine ranks 31st of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets, securities not included in official reserve assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and C. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Ukraine: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other-3/iceland/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other-3/iceland/ukraine/">Iceland vs Ukraine: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets, securities not included in official reserve assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and C
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
62 places, 1,102 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.