Argentina vs United Kingdom: Official Reserve Assets … Reserve Security Social excluding

Argentina
0
in 2025
United Kingdom
0
in 2025
Argentina rank
50th
United Kingdom rank
50th

Official Reserve Assets … Reserve Security Social excluding over time

  • Argentina
  • United Kingdom
010.0B20.0B30.0B200020122025

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0 against 0 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 50th and United Kingdom ranks 50th of 80 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 1.45 billion 413.99 million 1.04 billion Argentina
2010s 0 1.18 billion 1.18 billion United Kingdom
2020s 0 0 0 —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Argentina or United Kingdom?
Argentina, at 0 against 0 in United Kingdom as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Argentina and United Kingdom?
0, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and United Kingdom?
15 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Argentina and United Kingdom rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Argentina ranks 50th and United Kingdom ranks 50th of 80 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs United Kingdom: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 November 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other/argentina/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other/argentina/united-kingdom/">Argentina vs United Kingdom: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
82 places, 1,628 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.