Chile vs Poland: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Chile
14.45 billion
in 2025
Poland
7.18 billion
in 2025
Chile rank
4th
Poland rank
6th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Chile
  • Poland
010.0B20.0B30.0B200020122025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 14.45 billion against 7.18 billion in Poland, a difference of 7.27 billion.

That makes Chile's figure about 2.0 times Poland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Poland ahead.

Chile ranks 4th and Poland ranks 6th of 80 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 6.97 billion 74.62 million 6.90 billion Chile
2010s 25.61 billion 2.29 billion 23.33 billion Chile
2020s 15.46 billion 2.10 billion 13.36 billion Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Chile or Poland?
Chile, at 14.45 billion against 7.18 billion in Poland as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Chile and Poland?
7.27 billion, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Poland?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Chile and Poland rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Chile ranks 4th and Poland ranks 6th of 80 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Poland: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other/chile/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other/chile/poland/">Chile vs Poland: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
82 places, 1,628 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.