Czechia vs Malta: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Czechia
502.06 million
in 2025
Malta
295.01 million
in 2025
Czechia rank
28th
Malta rank
31st

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Czechia
  • Malta
0200.0M400.0M600.0M200020122025

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 502.06 million against 295.01 million in Malta, a difference of 207.06 million.

That makes Czechia's figure about 1.7 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Malta ahead.

Czechia ranks 28th and Malta ranks 31st of 80 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 171.76 million 341.50 million 169.75 million Malta
2010s 246.66 million 204.98 million 41.69 million Czechia
2020s 381.58 million 266.70 million 114.88 million Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Czechia or Malta?
Czechia, at 502.06 million against 295.01 million in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Czechia and Malta?
207.06 million, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Malta?
17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
How do Czechia and Malta rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Czechia ranks 28th and Malta ranks 31st of 80 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Malta: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other/czechia/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other/czechia/malta/">Czechia vs Malta: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
82 places, 1,628 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.