Iceland vs Luxembourg: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Iceland
1.47 million
in 2025
Luxembourg
0
in 2025
Iceland rank
48th
Luxembourg rank
50th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Iceland
  • Luxembourg
05.0B10.0B15.0B200120132025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 1.47 million against 0 in Luxembourg, a difference of 1.47 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Iceland ranks 48th and Luxembourg ranks 50th of 80 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 4.78 million 4.28 billion 4.28 billion Luxembourg
2010s 10.66 million 1.72 billion 1.70 billion Luxembourg
2020s 1.51 million 201.33 million 199.82 million Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Iceland or Luxembourg?
Iceland, at 1.47 million against 0 in Luxembourg as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Iceland and Luxembourg?
1.47 million, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Luxembourg?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Luxembourg rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Iceland ranks 48th and Luxembourg ranks 50th of 80 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Luxembourg: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other/iceland/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other/iceland/luxembourg/">Iceland vs Luxembourg: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
82 places, 1,628 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.