Denmark vs Peru: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Denmark
110.23 billion
in 2025
Peru
89.52 billion
in 2025
Denmark rank
28th
Peru rank
30th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Denmark
  • Peru
025.0B50.0B75.0B100.0B199920122025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 110.23 billion against 89.52 billion in Peru, a difference of 20.71 billion.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.2 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 28th and Peru ranks 30th of 91 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Peru Difference Ahead
2000s 40.88 billion 18.33 billion 22.55 billion Denmark
2010s 76.21 billion 59.51 billion 16.70 billion Denmark
2020s 90.45 billion 77.27 billion 13.19 billion Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Denmark or Peru?
Denmark, at 110.23 billion against 89.52 billion in Peru as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Denmark and Peru?
20.71 billion, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Peru?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Peru rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Denmark ranks 28th and Peru ranks 30th of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government exclud. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Peru: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value/denmark/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value/denmark/peru/">Denmark vs Peru: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government exclud
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,951 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.