Ecuador vs Mauritius: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Ecuador
10.71 billion
in 2025
Mauritius
10.34 billion
in 2025
Ecuador rank
62nd
Mauritius rank
64th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mauritius
2.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B10.0B200720162025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 10.71 billion against 10.34 billion in Mauritius, a difference of 365.80 million.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Mauritius ahead.

Ecuador ranks 62nd and Mauritius ranks 64th of 91 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mauritius Difference Ahead
2010s 2.81 billion 6.87 billion 4.06 billion Mauritius
2020s 8.16 billion 8.33 billion 162.78 million Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Ecuador or Mauritius?
Ecuador, at 10.71 billion against 10.34 billion in Mauritius as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Ecuador and Mauritius?
365.80 million, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mauritius?
8 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Mauritius rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Ecuador ranks 62nd and Mauritius ranks 64th of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government exclud. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Mauritius: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value/ecuador/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value/ecuador/mauritius/">Ecuador vs Mauritius: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government exclud
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,951 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.