Jamaica vs Latvia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Jamaica
6.38 billion
in 2025
Latvia
6.90 billion
in 2025
Jamaica rank
73rd
Latvia rank
71st

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Jamaica
  • Latvia
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B10.0B200020122025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 6.90 billion against 6.38 billion in Jamaica, a difference of 525.72 million.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Jamaica ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 71st of 91 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Latvia Difference Ahead
2010s 3.09 billion 5.40 billion 2.30 billion Latvia
2020s 5.04 billion 5.94 billion 893.50 million Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Jamaica or Latvia?
Latvia, at 6.90 billion against 6.38 billion in Jamaica as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Jamaica and Latvia?
525.72 million, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Latvia?
13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
How do Jamaica and Latvia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Jamaica ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 71st of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government exclud. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Latvia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value/jamaica/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value/jamaica/latvia/">Jamaica vs Latvia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government exclud
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,951 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.