Lithuania vs Mongolia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Lithuania
7.67 billion
in 2025
Mongolia
7.01 billion
in 2025
Lithuania rank
69th
Mongolia rank
70th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Lithuania
  • Mongolia
-150.0T-100.0T-50.0T0200420142025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 7.67 billion against 7.01 billion in Mongolia, a difference of 667.94 million.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 69th and Mongolia ranks 70th of 91 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Mongolia Difference Ahead
2010s 5.85 billion -55.36 trillion 55.37 trillion Lithuania
2020s 6.73 billion 4.95 billion 1.78 billion Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Lithuania or Mongolia?
Lithuania, at 7.67 billion against 7.01 billion in Mongolia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Lithuania and Mongolia?
667.94 million, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Mongolia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
How do Lithuania and Mongolia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Lithuania ranks 69th and Mongolia ranks 70th of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government exclud. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Mongolia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value/lithuania/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value/lithuania/mongolia/">Lithuania vs Mongolia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government exclud
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,951 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.