Morocco vs Serbia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Morocco
48.52 billion
in 2025
Serbia
34.08 billion
in 2025
Morocco rank
44th
Serbia rank
47th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Morocco
  • Serbia
10.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B200520152025

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 48.52 billion against 34.08 billion in Serbia, a difference of 14.44 billion.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.4 times Serbia's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Morocco has been ahead every year.

Morocco ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 47th of 91 countries.

Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Serbia Difference Ahead
2010s 25.68 billion 13.29 billion 12.39 billion Morocco
2020s 37.66 billion 24.66 billion 13.00 billion Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Morocco or Serbia?
Morocco, at 48.52 billion against 34.08 billion in Serbia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Morocco and Serbia?
14.44 billion, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Serbia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
How do Morocco and Serbia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Morocco ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 47th of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government exclud. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Serbia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value/morocco/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value/morocco/serbia/">Morocco vs Serbia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government exclud
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,951 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.