Norway vs Romania: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Norway
86.27 billion
in 2025
Romania
90.50 billion
in 2025
Norway rank
31st
Romania rank
29th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Norway
  • Romania
20.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B100.0B200020122025

How they compare

Romania currently reports 90.50 billion against 86.27 billion in Norway, a difference of 4.23 billion.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 31st and Romania ranks 29th of 91 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 56.37 billion 41.27 billion 15.10 billion Norway
2010s 59.56 billion 44.26 billion 15.30 billion Norway
2020s 80.08 billion 66.08 billion 14.00 billion Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Norway or Romania?
Romania, at 90.50 billion against 86.27 billion in Norway as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Norway and Romania?
4.23 billion, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Romania?
19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
How do Norway and Romania rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Norway ranks 31st and Romania ranks 29th of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government exclud. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Romania: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value/norway/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value/norway/romania/">Norway vs Romania: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government exclud
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,951 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.