Australia vs Belarus: Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6)

Australia
9.48 billion US dollar
in 2025
Belarus
9.04 billion US dollar
in 2025
Australia rank
38th
Belarus rank
39th

Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6) over time

  • Australia
  • Belarus
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B10.0B198920072025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 9.48 billion US dollar against 9.04 billion US dollar in Belarus, a difference of 434.71 million US dollar.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 38th and Belarus ranks 39th of 149 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 4.54 billion US dollar 397.30 million US dollar 4.14 billion US dollar Australia
2000s 4.92 billion US dollar 1.36 billion US dollar 3.56 billion US dollar Australia
2010s 8.05 billion US dollar 4.85 billion US dollar 3.20 billion US dollar Australia
2020s 9.48 billion US dollar 9.04 billion US dollar 434.71 million US dollar Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other investment, trade credits and advances, other sectors (bpm6), Australia or Belarus?
Australia, at 9.48 billion US dollar against 9.04 billion US dollar in Belarus as of 2025.
What is the difference in other investment, trade credits and advances, other sectors (bpm6) between Australia and Belarus?
434.71 million US dollar, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belarus?
23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Australia and Belarus rank globally for other investment, trade credits and advances, other sectors (bpm6)?
Australia ranks 38th and Belarus ranks 39th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6) (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Belarus: Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-trade-credits-and-advances-other-sectors-bpm6-assets-positions-us-dollar/australia/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-trade-credits-and-advances-other-sectors-bpm6-assets-positions-us-dollar/australia/belarus/">Australia vs Belarus: Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6) (Assets, Positions, US dollar)
Unit
US dollar
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
152 places, 3,369 data points, 1972–2025
Last refreshed

The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.