Curaçao vs Namibia: Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6)

Curaçao
87.21 million US dollar
in 2021
Namibia
90.39 million US dollar
in 2025
Curaçao rank
95th
Namibia rank
93rd

Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6) over time

  • Curaçao
  • Namibia
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M200020122025

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 90.39 million US dollar against 87.21 million US dollar in Curaçao, a difference of 3.18 million US dollar.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Curaçao ahead.

Curaçao ranks 95th and Namibia ranks 93rd of 140 countries.

Curaçao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curaçao Namibia Difference Ahead
2010s 102.94 million US dollar 47.79 million US dollar 55.15 million US dollar Curaçao
2020s 85.01 million US dollar 67.43 million US dollar 17.58 million US dollar Curaçao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other investment, trade credits and advances, other sectors (bpm6), Curaçao or Namibia?
Namibia, at 90.39 million US dollar against 87.21 million US dollar in Curaçao as of 2025.
What is the difference in other investment, trade credits and advances, other sectors (bpm6) between Curaçao and Namibia?
3.18 million US dollar, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Namibia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
How do Curaçao and Namibia rank globally for other investment, trade credits and advances, other sectors (bpm6)?
Curaçao ranks 95th and Namibia ranks 93rd of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6), Short-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curaçao vs Namibia: Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-trade-credits-and-advances-other-sectors-bpm6-short-term-assets/curacao/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-trade-credits-and-advances-other-sectors-bpm6-short-term-assets/curacao/namibia/">Curaçao vs Namibia: Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6), Short-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar)
Unit
US dollar
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
143 places, 2,847 data points, 1972–2025
Last refreshed

The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.