Mauritius vs Namibia: Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6)

Mauritius
111.56 million US dollar
in 2025
Namibia
90.39 million US dollar
in 2025
Mauritius rank
90th
Namibia rank
93rd

Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6) over time

  • Mauritius
  • Namibia
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M200020122025

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 111.56 million US dollar against 90.39 million US dollar in Namibia, a difference of 21.17 million US dollar.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 90th and Namibia ranks 93rd of 140 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 88.94 million US dollar 0 US dollar 88.94 million US dollar Mauritius
2010s 173.81 million US dollar 43.01 million US dollar 130.80 million US dollar Mauritius
2020s 121.54 million US dollar 91.95 million US dollar 29.58 million US dollar Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other investment, trade credits and advances, other sectors (bpm6), Mauritius or Namibia?
Mauritius, at 111.56 million US dollar against 90.39 million US dollar in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in other investment, trade credits and advances, other sectors (bpm6) between Mauritius and Namibia?
21.17 million US dollar, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for other investment, trade credits and advances, other sectors (bpm6)?
Mauritius ranks 90th and Namibia ranks 93rd of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6), Short-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Namibia: Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-trade-credits-and-advances-other-sectors-bpm6-short-term-assets/mauritius/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-trade-credits-and-advances-other-sectors-bpm6-short-term-assets/mauritius/namibia/">Mauritius vs Namibia: Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other investment, Trade credits and advances, Other Sectors (BPM6), Short-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar)
Unit
US dollar
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
143 places, 2,847 data points, 1972–2025
Last refreshed

The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.