Australia vs Rwanda: Other Items (Net)
Australia
81.01 billion
in 2012
Rwanda
73.99 billion
in 2005
Australia rank
38th
Rwanda rank
39th
Other Items (Net) over time
- Australia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Australia currently reports 81.01 billion against 73.99 billion in Rwanda, a difference of 7.02 billion.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 42 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 38th and Rwanda ranks 39th of 178 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 738.20 million | -472.22 million | 1.21 billion | Australia |
| 1970s | 3.31 billion | 911.69 million | 2.40 billion | Australia |
| 1980s | 27.53 billion | 3.62 billion | 23.91 billion | Australia |
| 1990s | 67.46 billion | 13.94 billion | 53.52 billion | Australia |
| 2000s | 65.57 billion | 49.70 billion | 15.86 billion | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other items (net), Australia or Rwanda?
- Australia, at 81.01 billion against 73.99 billion in Rwanda as of 2012.
- What is the difference in other items (net) between Australia and Rwanda?
- 7.02 billion, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Rwanda?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2005.
- How do Australia and Rwanda rank globally for other items (net)?
- Australia ranks 38th and Rwanda ranks 39th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Other Items (Net) (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Monetary and Financial Statistics (MFS), Non-standard dataset provides discontinued, vintage country-reported financial data that are not harmonized and use country-specific terms.