Iceland vs Japan: Other Items (Net)
Iceland
-2.32 trillion
in 2007
Japan
-4.21 trillion
in 2008
Iceland rank
171st
Japan rank
174th
Other Items (Net) over time
- Iceland
- Japan
How they compare
Iceland currently reports -2.32 trillion against -4.21 trillion in Japan, a difference of 1.89 trillion.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1953 it was Japan ahead.
Iceland ranks 171st and Japan ranks 174th of 178 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Japan in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 6.36 million | 1.11 trillion | 1.11 trillion | Japan |
| 1960s | 13.04 million | 3.08 trillion | 3.08 trillion | Japan |
| 1970s | 89.74 million | 13.19 trillion | 13.19 trillion | Japan |
| 1980s | 27.97 million | 10.55 trillion | 10.55 trillion | Japan |
| 1990s | -2.33 billion | -23.19 trillion | 23.19 trillion | Iceland |
| 2000s | -574.98 billion | -30.75 trillion | 30.17 trillion | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other items (net), Iceland or Japan?
- Iceland, at -2.32 trillion against -4.21 trillion in Japan as of 2007.
- What is the difference in other items (net) between Iceland and Japan?
- 1.89 trillion, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Japan?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1953 to 2007.
- How do Iceland and Japan rank globally for other items (net)?
- Iceland ranks 171st and Japan ranks 174th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Other Items (Net) (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Monetary and Financial Statistics (MFS), Non-standard dataset provides discontinued, vintage country-reported financial data that are not harmonized and use country-specific terms.