Australia vs China: Policy and Operational Strategy (P0)
Policy and Operational Strategy (P0) over time
- Australia
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 109.07 against 109.02 in Australia, a difference of 0.05.
Across all 12 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 25th and China ranks 24th of 47 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 103.01 | 106.05 | 3.04 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher policy and operational strategy (p0), Australia or China?
- China, at 109.07 against 109.02 in Australia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in policy and operational strategy (p0) between Australia and China?
- 0.05, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and China?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Australia and China rank globally for policy and operational strategy (p0)?
- Australia ranks 25th and China ranks 24th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Policy and Operational Strategy (P0) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).